Which assessment type primarily evaluates how well a test measures what it is supposed to measure?

The correct choice focuses on construct validity, which is a crucial concept in psychological testing and measurement. Construct validity refers to the extent to which a test accurately measures the theoretical construct or concept it is intended to evaluate. For instance, if a test is designed to measure intelligence, construct validity would assess whether the test indeed captures the various dimensions and aspects of intelligence as defined in psychological theory.

In the context of assessments, demonstrating strong construct validity means that the test correlates well with other established measures of the same construct and that it behaves as expected in research settings. In essence, construct validity provides evidence that the test is not only assessing a trait but is doing so in a manner that aligns with theoretical conceptions and empirical findings related to that trait.

The other validity types, while related to how tests measure constructs, approach evaluation from different angles. Face validity pertains to how valid a test appears on the surface, while content validity examines whether the test covers the entire range of the construct it aims to measure. Predictive validity, on the other hand, assesses how well a test predicts future performance or outcomes related to the construct. Each of these types plays a role in understanding test validity but does not specifically focus on the overall correctness of what a test is measuring in